Every list of the best AI porn sites ranks them. Almost none prices them. The numbers that decide whether a site is worth opening are the ones the listicles skip: what one image costs in credits, how many seconds of video a month’s allowance buys, how you switch off auto-renewal, what the refund clause says when you change your mind an hour later, and what the site’s own rules forbid you from making. We read the pricing pages, terms, refund and content policies and help centres of ten of these services on 9 September 2026 and wrote down what they say — including where they say nothing at all.
Two findings shape the page. “AI porn site” means two different products, and buying the wrong one is the commonest way to waste money here. And the money is rarely where the headline price is: four of the ten publish no price at all before you create an account, and on the ones that do, a single minute of video can cost more credits than a whole month includes.
The short version
- Best free entry for generating: Promptchan AI’s $0 tier, explicitly “no card required” — though it never says how many daily gems that is. Paid tiers $14.99, $23.99, $33.99 a month.
- Clearest credit menu: SoulGen — 1 credit an image, 15 credits per 5 seconds of video, 40 at 1080p, against $12.99 a month or $90.99 a year.
- Only service that states the cost of a full minute of video: OurDream AI — 100 coins per 5 seconds, 1,200 coins for its 60-second maximum, against a 1,000-coin monthly allowance.
- Best refund clause: Promptchan — “Refunds are available within 30 days of the purchase date”. Candy AI gives 24 hours, or 14 days in the EU and UK. CrushOn, Nastia and HeraHaven state that fees are non-refundable outright.
- Nothing to cancel: ZenCreator sells one-time packs — “Credits never expire. Use them at your own pace — no deadlines, no resets.” Read its Content Policy first: it bans “Pornographic or sexually explicit content of any kind”.
- Where we would not start: HeraHaven AI — no public pricing route, no explicit real-person clause in its prohibited-uses article, and data kept five years after you delete the account.
- Not one of the ten publishes what its charge looks like on a bank statement.
Generators vs catalogues: what you are actually looking for
People type this query for two different things, and the lists that rank them together are why so many signups end in a refund request.
A catalogue is a feed of finished AI images and clips made by other users or by the platform. You scroll inventory; nothing is made to your brief. Most products below carry one inside the generator: Promptchan lists community gallery access on its free tier, DarLink’s homepage is a public feed of user-published characters, CrushOn’s Discover is a tagged library, and OurDream advertises “Over 11 million characters” on one page and 7 million on another, so treat the scale claim loosely. Two catalogue mechanics cost real money and are almost never mentioned: on OurDream, unlocking one character’s entire existing archive of images and videos — a Community Pack — costs 1,000 dreamcoins, a full month’s allowance; on Seduced, the 2-day trial watermarks downloads, and downloading other users’ public generations is a paid-plan feature. Free browsing, paid keeping.
A generator charges per output, in credits, gems, coins or tokens. The per-unit price matters more than the monthly one, because the monthly price is usually an allowance wearing a subscription’s clothing: an image runs 1 credit on SoulGen, 2 tokens on DarLink, 1–3 credits on ZenCreator, 5 coins on OurDream, while video is priced per five seconds nearly everywhere. Sub-category breakdowns sit on best NSFW AI image generators and best NSFW AI video generators.
A companion app — Candy AI, Nastia, HeraHaven, CrushOn — is a chat product where pictures come out of the same wallet as the conversation. Candy spends tokens “across voice, chat, image, and video”, so an evening of talking spends the same balance as a picture. If you came for images, this is the most expensive route to them. That category is covered in best NSFW AI chat apps.
One setting to check before the first prompt: whether your own output lands in the public gallery. CrushOn states “All chats and characters you create are private unless you choose to publish them”. Nastia rules the question out — “There is no public feed, no public profiles, no public galleries, and no sharing of content between users.” Seduced warns the other way: “If you post content or interact publicly on the Platform, this information may be visible”, with no stated default. Promptchan defines the prompts it collects as those entered “while using our public mode feature”, implying a non-public mode it never describes.
Ten AI porn sites compared
All figures verified 9 Sep 2026 against each service’s own pages. “Not published” means the number is not on any page reachable without an account.
| Site | Type | Free entry | Price (verified 9 Sep 2026) | Refund window | Real-person clause |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promptchan AI | Generator + gallery | $0, “no card required”, daily gems (size not published) | $14.99 / $23.99 / $33.99 a month; no annual toggle | 30 days, minimal usage; crypto final | Yes |
| OurDream AI | Companion + generator, big library | Chat at 1 coin a message; images and video blurred | $19.99/mo or $119.88/yr ($9.99/mo) | 14 days at its discretion; 25%-used cut-off | Yes — no photo uploads at all |
| SoulGen | Generator | Not confirmed | $12.99 for one month, no auto-renewal; $90.99/yr ($7.58/mo) | Only if no image was ever created | Not found |
| Candy AI | Companion, one token pool | Free trial; limits not published | Not published — three tiers, 70%-off banner, no base price | 24 hours; 14 days in EU/UK | Yes |
| DarLink AI | Companion + public feed | Not confirmed | $12.99 / $27.99 / $49.99 a month ($9.99 / $18.99 / $32.99 annual) | None for change of mind | Partly — sells public-figure personas |
| Seduced | Generator + public generations | 2-day trial; downloads watermarked | Not published — only “$30-$150/month” on its referrals page | 14 days, unused credits only | Yes |
| CrushOn AI | Chat + tagged catalogue | $0, 100 credits; history deleted after 7 days idle | $5.99/mo ($58.88/yr), $14.99 promo ($19.99 base), $39.99, up to $199.99 | None — no refunds of usage fees | Yes |
| ZenCreator | Pay-as-you-go generator | None disclosed | Packs: 200/$19.99, 550/$49.99, 1,200/$99, 6,300/$499 | Billing errors only | Yes |
| Nastia AI | Closed companion | Daily free messages, no card; quota not published | Not published — shown only after login | None — “All purchases are non-refundable” | Yes |
| HeraHaven AI | Companion | “Join for free”; no numbers | Not published — no pricing route on the site | None — all charges final | Not found |
What it costs: subscriptions, tokens and what they really add up to
Three billing shapes, and the difference matters more than any feature list. A flat subscription meters nothing you can see. An allowance subscription charges the same but caps output — the cap is what you actually bought. A pay-as-you-go pack charges once and leaves you holding credits.
Dividing the published price by the published allowance gives a figure no review seems to print. SoulGen: 100 credits for $12.99 is about 13 cents a credit, and an image is 1 credit — so 13 cents an image, or 8 cents on the annual plan. OurDream: 1,000 coins for $19.99 is about 2 cents a coin, and images cost 5 coins in chat or 10 per two in the generator — about 10 cents, half that annually. DarLink: $12.99 for 100 coins at 2 tokens an image is about 26 cents, and 50 images a month; note the plan grid says “coins” where the cost list says “tokens”. ZenCreator: 10 cents a credit on the Starter pack, so 10–30 cents an image, falling to 8–24 cents on the $499 pack. Promptchan, Seduced, Candy, Nastia, HeraHaven: not computable — either the per-generation cost or the plan price is unpublished.
Video is where the allowance breaks
Video sells in five-second blocks, priced so one long clip outruns a month of subscription. SoulGen charges 15 credits per 5 seconds for SoulGen 3.0, and SoulOmni 2.0 Turbo costs 25 at 720p, 40 at 1080p. Against 100 credits a month that is 33 seconds of silent video, or 12.5 seconds at 1080p; a 1080p minute needs 480 credits, about $36 on the annual plan and around $62 at the monthly rate.
OurDream is the only one publishing the price of a complete minute: 100 coins per 5 seconds to a 60-second maximum, stated as 1,200 coins — more than the 1,000 a month includes, so about $24 of coins monthly or about $12 annually. Ultra quality is a flat 200 coins, extending a clip costs 50% of the original, audio 20 coins a second, voice calls 50 a minute. DarLink charges 20 tokens a video on every tier but never states how long a video is. ZenCreator’s video runs 15–300 credits, so about $1.50 to $30 per generation at the Starter pack’s rate. Promptchan puts video on the $33.99 tier without publishing gem cost or length. Seduced publishes lengths instead of prices: up to 10 seconds a generation on Pro, 6 seconds extending to 12 on Platinum, up to 18 on Diamond with the longest clips dropping to low resolution.
Keep one unit in mind: a five-second clip is not a video. Anything you would watch is six to twelve blocks — on most of these services, a month’s allowance spent on one scene.
The prices you cannot see before signing up
Candy AI names three tiers, shows a 70%-off banner with no base price, and its /pricing URL 404s. Nastia shows plans only inside the logged-in membership page. HeraHaven has no pricing route at all, and its Terms say fees are “as presented on our website at the time of the purchase” — inside checkout. Seduced loads its figures in the browser, so the only number in its plain text is that $30–$150 range on the affiliate page. This matters beyond inconvenience: when a price appears only after signup, every review quoting one is quoting a different region, an undated promotion, or another review. Where we could not read a number, we leave it blank.
What every one of these bans
“Uncensored” is a marketing word. Every service here publishes a list of things it refuses to generate, and those lists hold the real differences — including ones that contradict the homepage. All ten ban content involving minors, state zero tolerance and say they report it; Nastia, a French company, names the French National Police and the PHAROS platform. Beyond that baseline the lists diverge, and the column that decided our recommendations is the real-person consent clause.
| Site | Real people, quoted from its own rules | Also explicitly banned | Where it is written |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candy AI | “Create, publish, or share images that resemble real persons”; “zero-tolerance policy for the creation or attempted creation of non-consensual intimate imagery” | Deepfakes (“This content will be removed”), impersonation, bestiality | Community Guidelines §12; Blocked Content Policy §1(g), §1(h) |
| OurDream AI | “Content designed to resemble, depict, or impersonate real individuals — including public figures and celebrities — without their consent is prohibited” | Gore, bestiality, incest, trafficking, extremism, non-consent framed as the appeal | Prohibited Content Policy §1 (modified 9 June 2026) |
| Promptchan AI | “Any depiction or impersonation of celebrities, public figures, or private individuals without consent”; “Non-consensual deepfake or intimate imagery” | Bestiality, extreme violence, privacy and IP violations | Terms §3; Content Moderation Policy §8 |
| Seduced | “Deepfakes or any images that portray real individuals without their explicit consent, including non-consensual sexual content, harmful impersonations, or defamation” | Illegal content, bestiality; Replicate Face/Pose needs identity verification | Terms §4; §15 for verification |
| ZenCreator | “Use real person’s image, likeness, voice, identity without required rights and permissions”; “Deepfake face replacement or body alteration” | “Pornographic or sexually explicit content of any kind” — on a site marketed as unrestricted. Also bestiality, non-consent | Terms §6.0, §6.4; Content Policy §2, §4, §5 |
| CrushOn AI | “Do not post real images or overly realistic AI-generated images of any individuals”; its FAQ bans “Real life images (Including real life figures such as celebrities, politicians, or those you may personally know.)” | “Avoid depicting explicit sexual activity and stimulation. Implied sexual activity is permitted when contextually appropriate.” Also NCII, bestiality | Community Guidelines; General FAQ; Terms of Use |
| Nastia AI | “Create, upload, or generate content that depicts a real identifiable person without their express written consent” | NCII, likeness misuse, discriminatory content. Its 2257 statement: “No actual human beings are depicted in any visual content” | Terms §8, §9; Content Take-Down Policy; 2257 statement |
| DarLink AI | Bars impersonating a real person “except when interacting with AI personas clearly labeled as such” — while selling an Influencer-Specific Subscription based on public figures | “content depicting bestiality, rape or non-consensual sexual violence… is prohibited”; doxxing, gore, trafficking | Terms §5.1, §5.2; §1 and §3 for influencer personas |
| SoulGen | Not found. The nearest is “Contains any private or personal information of a third party without such third party’s consent” | Content that is “unlawful, harmful, libelous… obscene, abusive… pornographic”. No named deepfake or bestiality clause | Terms §5.2, §5.2e |
| HeraHaven AI | Not found in its prohibited-uses article; resemblance complaints go through a separate Content Removal Policy | Trafficking and exploitation in detail, scraping, passing AI output off as human-made | Terms §2; Content Removal Policy |
The rule we applied: a service gets a recommendation from us only if its own rules explicitly ban imagery of real people without their consent. Eight of the ten have that clause and we quote it. Two — SoulGen and HeraHaven — did not, in the documents we read. They stay on the page because they are widely listed, but they are marked, and the absence is a fact about the product rather than a gap in our reading. SoulGen needs one extra line: its credit table prices a “Looks Like” option at 2 credits an image and never explains what it matches against, so we would not use it in connection with any real person’s face.
Two contradictions are worth slowing down for. ZenCreator’s Content Policy bans explicit content of any kind while its homepage advertises an unrestricted generator — same site, and used credits are not refundable, so the risk of buying a pack and finding your use case banned is yours. CrushOn markets no-filter NSFW chat while telling users to avoid depicting explicit sexual activity. Both are reasons to read the policy before paying.
Cancelling, refunds and deleting your account
Auto-renewal is on by default on every card subscription here. These are the published routes off it, verified 9 Sep 2026.
- OurDream AI: profile page → “Cancel subscription” → confirm. Access runs to period end and “No automatic refunds for cancellation.” Resubscribing later does not restore old coins.
- CrushOn AI: Profile → My Subscription → Manage → Cancel Subscription, and “Cancellations must be submitted before your next billing date.” Store subscriptions cancel in the store.
- Nastia AI: six steps — sidebar, the three-dot menu on your profile row, Membership, Manage, Danger Zone, Cancel membership. Access runs to the end of the period.
- Candy AI: “You have the flexibility to cancel your subscription at any time by going to Settings / Unsubscribe within your account.” (Terms §10.1.)
- Promptchan AI: “You may cancel your subscription at any time through your account settings” (Terms §4), effective at cycle end.
- Seduced: log in, open the plans page, choose Cancel Subscription under My Plan. Crypto payments are one-time; add-ons cancel separately.
- SoulGen: the only one sending you off-site — “If you don’t want to renew, you can cancel it in your PayPal account by yourself” (Terms §1.2a). The monthly plan shown on 9 September 2026 was one month without auto-renewal.
- DarLink AI: account settings per the Terms — but its Refund page says “Cancellation takes effect once our customer support team receives your written cancellation notice.” Do both, keep the email, and note that deleting the account does not stop a store subscription.
- HeraHaven AI: self-serve in settings, or email support; 30 days’ notice is promised before a price rise. ZenCreator: nothing recurring, only an optional card auto-top-up whose off switch is undocumented.
Refunds: four clauses to read before you pay
Promptchan has the most generous written policy: “Refunds are available within 30 days of the purchase date”, measured from each annual charge separately, conditioned on minimal usage — and “All cryptocurrency transactions are final and non-refundable.” Candy AI gives 24 hours from payment plus the statutory 14-day withdrawal right in the EU and UK (Terms §10.4.1, §10.4.3). Seduced puts a hard edge on the same right: “After 14 days from the date of purchase or renewal, your right to withdraw will automatically expire” (Terms §20), unspent credits only. OurDream offers a 14-day quality guarantee at its discretion, then narrows it in the help centre — “We cannot issue refunds for product that has used more than 25% of it’s amount”.
Then the ones with no window. CrushOn: “We will not issue refunds of usage fees”, and no partial refunds for unused time. Nastia: “All purchases are non-refundable.” HeraHaven: “All charges are final and non-refundable, including subscription fees, recurring payments, Luna Package purchases, and cryptocurrency transactions.” SoulGen is narrowest of all — “The only way to get refunded is only if you never create any image” — a refund only for people who never used what they bought. ZenCreator refunds billing errors only, because “Credits are consumed when a generation starts.” DarLink treats purchases as final, with carve-outs for verified fraud and its own billing errors.
Deleting the account, and what survives it
Deletion and cancellation are different actions, and conflating them is how people keep paying for a service they think they left — Promptchan’s support hub lists “I deleted my account but I’m still being charged” as a FAQ entry. CrushOn and Nastia refuse to delete an account while a subscription is active, which protects you.
- Nastia AI documents the cleanest exit: sidebar → profile menu → Account → Danger zone, type “delete my account”, enter your password. “Account deletion is permanent and irreversible.” Companions, conversations, images, videos and remaining tokens go immediately; isolated backups may persist.
- OurDream AI: profile → danger zone → delete, processed in 24–48 hours. It removes “All generations, unpublished characters, and chat history” plus unused coins, and cancels the subscription automatically.
- CrushOn AI: Profile → Settings → Delete Account. Its FAQ says the account “cannot be recovered” and then that you can recover it by logging in within 3 days — a contradiction that reads like a three-day soft delete.
- ZenCreator: deletion through the service or by email, permanent, 30-day response on GDPR requests. SoulGen documents a Delete Account button. Seduced processes account closure “within one (1) month unless a longer period is necessary”. DarLink calls deletion permanent but notes residual backup archives with no timeframe.
- Candy AI is the gap: its Terms cover stopping the billing, not deleting the account, and erasure is framed as a request granted in limited circumstances. We found no confirmed self-serve delete button.
- HeraHaven AI is the one to read twice: deletion is an erasure request answered within 30 days, and the retention table keeps registration and chat data — text, images, video, audio — for “5 years after the erasure of your account”.
One thing that is not deletion but feels like it: on OurDream, stopping payment does not remove your library, it blurs it — “if you were to unsubscribe from the service all images and videos generated would be blurred” — so download anything you want to keep first. Resubscribing unblurs it.
Privacy, and what your bank sees
The answer people actually want: not one of these ten publishes the descriptor that appears on a card statement. We checked the terms, privacy policies, refund pages and help centres of all ten. The only clues are the processors each names — Epoch and CCBill on Seduced, a “Card (voltpay)” option on ZenCreator, Stripe and Solidgate in Nastia’s page code — so the line will probably reference a processor rather than the brand. Probably is not verified, and we will not print a descriptor we have not seen. The other lever is payment method: Candy accepts “Visa, MasterCard, and crypto too, including BTC, ETH, USDC, Litecoin, and others”; DarLink takes crypto on annual plans only; ZenCreator takes USDT and USDC. Everywhere, crypto is the payment that can never be refunded.
What happens to what you type is documented unevenly. Candy is bluntest about third parties — recipients include moderation vendors, and “these third parties may receive the content of your messages exchanged with our chatbot”. HeraHaven discloses human review: a periodic sample check means “your communication with the chatbot may become visible by our employees, who are bound by confidentiality agreements”. DarLink stores chat text, voice messages and images and may train on anonymised conversation data. CrushOn trains on chat content but says it does not link it to specific users.
Retention is the other half. SoulGen deletes unpublished creations and their prompts after 7 days, keeping published content until you remove it — the strongest statement here. Candy keeps account data three years after your last activity, financial records ten years, logs 30 days. HeraHaven keeps everything five years past erasure. OurDream states AES encryption at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit on SOC 2 Type 2 infrastructure — worth reading next to its homepage claim that conversations are end-to-end encrypted and “No one can read them, not even us”, wording the Privacy Policy does not repeat. Nobody else documents an encryption standard for stored content, and none of the ten offers an incognito mode.
The most underrated clause here belongs to DarLink. Dispute a charge and “we reserve the right to disclose all relevant account and communication records to the payment processor or bank”, which “may include private messages or content you have sent/received”. A chargeback on an adult AI service can put your chat logs in front of your bank. Contact support first — everywhere, but especially there.
The ten in detail
1. Promptchan AI — best free entry, only 30-day refund
Promptchan is the closest thing here to an honest front door: a $0 tier with “no card required”, then $14.99 (Plus, 100 gems), $23.99 (Premium, 400) and $33.99 (Pro, 800 gems plus unlimited casual generations, 4K images, video with extend and voice). Cancellation is self-serve and the refund window is 30 days. The gap is the gem economy: neither the per-generation gem cost nor the free daily allowance is published, so the cost per image is unknowable from outside. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
2. OurDream AI — the only one that prices everything
OurDream publishes a full price list for actions, which outweighs several flashier features. $19.99 a month, or $119.88 a year billed once ($9.99 a month), includes unlimited messages and 1,000 dreamcoins monthly. Every action then has a number: 5 coins an in-chat image, 100 per 5 seconds of video to a 60-second maximum, 50 a minute for voice calls, 1,000 for one character’s archive. Coins do not expire, but you cannot buy them without an active subscription, and deletion destroys them. Reference-photo uploads are blocked outright: “We do not allow for the uploading of reference photos to OurDream due to possible deepfakes and other legal problems.” Verified 9 Sep 2026.
3. SoulGen — clearest credit menu, listed with a rules gap
SoulGen (soulgen.net now redirects to soulgen.ai) has the most legible per-action table of any generator here: 1 credit an image, 2 with “Looks Like”, 15 credits per 5 seconds of video, 25 at 720p and 40 at 1080p, chat at 0.2 credits a message. On 9 September 2026 its Pro plan showed $12.99 for one month without auto-renewal and $90.99 for a year ($7.58 a month), with 100 credits monthly or 1,200 annually. Unpublished creations and prompts are deleted after 7 days. It is listed rather than recommended for two reasons: the narrowest refund clause here, and no explicit ban on imagery of real people in its Terms. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
4. Candy AI — strong rules, invisible pricing
Candy AI sits near the top of almost every competing list, most of which rank it without printing a price. Neither can we: /pricing 404s, the homepage names three tiers with a 70%-off banner and no figures, and token counts are unpublished. What is documented is good — one token pool across voice, chat, image and video, card or crypto payment, cancellation at Settings → Unsubscribe, refunds in 24 hours plus the EU/UK 14-day right, and a policy prohibiting images resembling real persons. Two caveats: moderation vendors may receive your chat content, and we found no self-serve account deletion. Full write-up: Candy AI review. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
5. DarLink AI — cheap entry, two contradictions
DarLink publishes Essential at $12.99 a month or $9.99 billed yearly, Advanced $27.99 or $18.99, Ultimate $49.99 or $32.99, with 100, 300 and 500 coins and message caps of 6,000, 9,000 and unlimited. Images cost 2 tokens, videos 20 — 50 images or 5 videos a month on Essential, with video length never stated, and a countdown promo was running when the prices were captured. Three things to weigh: cancellation is documented in settings but the Refund page demands written notice; a chargeback allows disclosure of your private messages to the bank; and DarLink sells an Influencer-Specific Subscription for personas based on named public figures. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
6. Seduced — longest clips, no public price
Seduced (seduced.ai redirects here) publishes quotas instead of prices: 300 generations a month on Pro, 750 on Platinum, 2,250 on Diamond, plus model training from $60. Video lengths are unusually specific — up to 10 seconds a generation on Pro, 6 seconds extending to 12 on Platinum, up to 18 on Diamond with the longest clips dropping to low resolution — and the two-day trial watermarks downloads. The problem is pricing: nothing in the page source, only that “$30-$150/month” range on its referrals page. Its Terms ban deepfakes of real individuals without explicit consent, and its Replicate Face/Pose feature requires identity verification — not a feature we would point at anyone else’s face. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
7. CrushOn AI — the most granular pricing here
CrushOn publishes more pricing detail than anyone on this page: a free tier with 100 message credits a month, then $5.99 a month or $58.88 a year with 2,000 credits, a promotional $14.99 against a $19.99 base with 6,000, $39.99 with 20,000, and higher tiers to $199.99, plus a Pro Chat Package at $39.99 for 30 days. Every tier states its memory size, reply length and history depth. Two realities to price in: the free tier deletes chat history after 7 days of inactivity, and this is a chat product whose own guidelines tell users to avoid explicit imagery. Refunds do not exist. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
8. ZenCreator — nothing renews, but read the content policy
ZenCreator is the only pay-as-you-go option: 200 credits for $19.99, 550 for $49.99, 1,200 for $99, 6,300 for $499, one-time, credits never expire. Per-tool costs are published — image 1–3 credits, face swap 1–3, lip-sync 3 per second, video 15–300 — and failed generations are normally credited back. No subscription, no free tier, and an optional card auto-top-up with no documented off switch. The catch can decide the purchase: the homepage markets an unrestricted generator while the Content Policy bans explicit content of any kind, along with deepfake face replacement. Used credits are gone. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
9. Nastia AI — cleanest exit, strictest refund
Nastia is a French company running a deliberately closed product: private and group chats, image and video generation, voice messages, and no public feed, profiles or galleries at all. Its 2257 statement says all visual content is AI-generated, and its Terms ban generating content depicting a real identifiable person without express written consent. Cancellation and deletion are documented step by step, deletion is immediate, and a subscription must be cancelled first. What it costs is unknown until you register — there is a free tier with daily messages and no card — and the refund policy is one sentence: “All purchases are non-refundable.” Verified 9 Sep 2026.
10. HeraHaven AI — listed for completeness, not recommended
HeraHaven appears on plenty of lists, so here is what its own documents say. There is no pricing route on the site; fees are whatever checkout shows, and a paid “Luna Package” has no published price or contents. All charges are final and non-refundable, crypto included, with no proration. Three facts keep it last: its prohibited-uses article contains no explicit clause on real-person likeness or deepfakes, handling resemblance complaints through a separate removal policy; it discloses periodic human sampling of conversations; and it keeps chat data, images and audio for five years after the erasure of your account. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
What we left out and why
Nudify and undress tools, and face-swap aimed at real people. Any service whose pitch is uploading a photograph of a real person and removing their clothes, or pasting a real face into sexual content, is permanently out of scope here. The TAKE IT DOWN Act was signed on 19 May 2025: from that date, publishing non-public intimate images of a real person — including images created by AI — is a federal crime in the United States. From 19 May 2026, platforms are required to remove such material within 48 hours of a valid request. The exposure is not hypothetical, and it does not sit with the tool.
Muah AI is excluded by name. Its character creation invites you to upload a photo, its chat tools include an “X-Ray” function with an explicit-content toggle, and we could find no clause in its reachable terms restricting uploads to your own likeness or barring a real third party’s photo. That fails our inclusion test, so it is neither listed nor linked.
Services whose rules we could not read. Several directory-style sites ranking for this query publish no terms, content policy or refund policy — nothing to verify, and nothing to rely on if a charge goes wrong. We also left out catalogues republishing other people’s generations with no stated provenance, because there you cannot establish whether anyone consented to anything.
One honest limit. We did not buy or operate these services and do not claim to have. Everything above comes from each company’s own pricing pages, terms, refund and content policies, privacy notices and help centres, read on 9 September 2026, with quotes and section numbers so you can check us. Adult AI pricing moves fast and several of these pages were running countdown promotions, so treat every figure as true on that date and re-check before you pay.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between an AI porn site and an AI porn generator?
A catalogue shows finished AI images and clips other people made; you browse, and pay only to download without a watermark or to unlock a particular archive. A generator charges you to make your own, metered in credits, gems, coins or tokens. Several products here are both, which is why the same names appear on lists of “sites” and of “generators”.
Is there a genuinely free AI porn site?
There is free browsing, and a limited free generator. Promptchan publishes a $0 tier with a daily gem allowance and “no card required”, without saying how many gems. CrushOn gives 100 message credits a month and deletes chat history after 7 days of inactivity. OurDream’s free tier is text chat at 1 coin a message, images and video blurred. Nastia offers daily free messages without a card. Verified 9 Sep 2026.
How much does a minute of AI video cost?
On the two services publishing enough to calculate it: OurDream’s 60-second maximum is 1,200 coins, about $24 of coins on the $19.99 monthly plan or about $12 annually — more than a month includes either way. SoulGen’s 1080p video needs 480 credits a minute, roughly $36 on the annual plan and around $62 at the monthly rate, against a 100-credit allowance. Everywhere else the per-clip cost or the clip length is unpublished, so the minute cannot be priced.
Can I get a refund if I change my mind?
Only on some, and only quickly. Promptchan publishes 30 days with minimal usage. Candy AI gives 24 hours, or 14 days for EU and UK customers. Seduced and OurDream work to 14-day windows, with OurDream refusing refunds once more than 25% of a product is used. CrushOn, Nastia and HeraHaven state fees are non-refundable, SoulGen refunds only if you never created an image, ZenCreator only for billing errors. Crypto is non-refundable everywhere.
Will deleting my account stop the billing?
Not reliably — cancel first, then delete. CrushOn and Nastia refuse to delete while a subscription is active, which protects you. Promptchan lists “I deleted my account but I’m still being charged” as a known issue. DarLink warns that deleting the app or account does not cancel an App Store or Google Play subscription. OurDream cancels automatically on deletion, and destroys unused coins with no refund when it does.
Can I upload a photo of a real person?
No, and most of these services say so in writing. OurDream blocks reference-photo uploads entirely. Candy, Promptchan, Seduced, ZenCreator, CrushOn and Nastia all ban imagery depicting real or identifiable people without consent, naming deepfakes and non-consensual intimate imagery separately. Beyond the terms, the TAKE IT DOWN Act signed on 19 May 2025 makes publishing non-public intimate images of a real person, AI-generated included, a federal crime in the United States, and since 19 May 2026 platforms must remove such material within 48 hours of a valid request.
How will the charge look on my bank statement?
None of the ten publishes its billing descriptor, so nobody can answer this honestly from public pages. Expect a processor name rather than the brand — Epoch or CCBill on Seduced, something resembling “voltpay” on ZenCreator — but we have not seen a statement and will not print a guess. If discretion is the priority, the documented alternative is crypto, accepted by Candy, OurDream, Promptchan, Seduced, ZenCreator and DarLink, with the trade-off that it closes the door on refunds.
Where to go next
For images, the per-credit comparison is in best NSFW AI image generators; for clips, best NSFW AI video generators; for conversation, best NSFW AI chat apps. Everything here is indexed on the AI hub. If it is live people rather than generated ones, that is the other half of this site — our cam site comparisons cover pricing and payment mechanics the same way.